一种新的多级线圈炮级间触发控制设想
湖北小龚2014/03/03电磁炮 IP:广东
现在大多数的多级线圈炮触发控制都是采用光电式或者电刷式,那能不能采用感应式的呢?
1.比如在两级发射线圈之间加一个感应线圈,因为弹丸在经过上一级线圈加速后已经被磁化,被磁化的弹丸通过感应线圈时会在感应线圈上产生感应电流,利用这个感应电流经三极管放大后控制下一级线圈的可控硅触发。用这种方式的话,它的反应速度应该会比光电式的要快,对级间控制更精确!是否要在各个线圈外包一层反射层,防止发射线圈影响到感应线圈?在线圈外包一层反射层后线圈效率会不会提高?
2.直接在上一级的发射线圈上再绕几圈做为感应线圈,用它感应出来的电流经一个可调电阻给一个电容充电,做为延时,电容充满后放电触发下一级线圈的可控硅。调整这个可调电阻可以控制延时时间。
各位大神觉得可行吗?
来自:物理高能技术 / 电磁炮
10
已屏蔽 原因:{{ notice.reason }}已屏蔽
{{notice.noticeContent}}
~~空空如也
RodTech
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
673640
1早已成为惯用了 具体首创应该是一个外国人,google"v switch" 应该能看到他成功的设计与感应线路
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
湖北小龚作者
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
673647
[s:10]原来别人早就这样做了啊!
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
十六夜水月
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
673661
你这个方案里,弹丸被磁化了,你用霍尔传感器比绕线圈方便而且更稳定。
我在考虑直接用动力线圈作为感应。
弹丸的质量固定,事先计算好弹丸飞行到线圈中心的时候电容正好完成放电,不一定要十分准确,大概在线圈内就可以。
这样弹丸继续飞行线圈就会感应出反向电动势,反向动势减到最小的时候说明弹丸已经远离发射线圈进入下一级加速。
可惜手头没有示波器,攒钱买示波器再去实验。
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
十六夜水月
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
673663
补充:无感无刷电机就是用动力线圈做感应的,用一个单片机来计算转子的位置,如果能直接用动力线圈感应弹丸的位置,用单片机来计算,这样就可以大大降低电磁枪的机械复杂度。
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
王小个
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
673744

你这个方案里,弹丸被磁化了,你用霍尔传感器比绕线圈方便而且更稳定。
我在考虑直接用动力线圈作为感应。
弹丸的质量固定,事先计算好弹丸飞行到线圈中心的时候电容正好完成放电,不一定要十分准确,大概在线圈内就可以。
这样弹丸继续飞行线圈就会感应出反向电动势,反向动势减到最小的时候说明弹丸已经远离发射线圈进入下一级加速。
可惜手头没有示波器,攒钱买示波器再去实验。

我们学校有一屋子的。。。呵呵呵
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
湖北小龚作者
10年3个月前 IP:未同步
674103
十六夜水月 发表于 2014-3-3 21:44
补充:无感无刷电机就是用动力线圈做感应的,用一个单片机来计算转子的位置,如果能直接用动力线圈感应弹丸 ...


看来这才是线圈炮的王道啊!!!
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
Ma3.02的守望
8年3个月前 IP:陕西
808211
替版主发下找到的感应开关资料,原文:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/v_XXXXXXXXXm
希望引起重视

vsw.gif As a key of commutation of current in a coil I use a usual silicon-controlled rectifier (SCR). It has some advantages compared to MOSFET, IGBT and other power semiconductors.
They are low price, small size, a huge overload power, one more advantage is that a big amount of power can be switched or controlled using a small triggering current or voltage. A small SCR intended for direct current 25 amps by a short impulse continuing 10 ms can sustain a current up to 350 amps.

  In the coil the impulse is even shorter ? a bit more than 1 ms and the current 400 amps doesn?t cause destruction of SCR.

The main drawback of SCR is impossibility of switching it off by means of control electrode. I obviate this difficulty with the help of a specially designed scheme V-switch.

Compared to the usual scheme with a capacitor and SCR, the scheme V-switch is supplied with one smaller capacitor and SCR. Additional capacity is chosen approximately from 1/15 till 1/10 value of the main capacitor. I use equal thyristors: intended for direct current 25 amps and voltage 1400 volts.

In the initial state the main capacitor 600 uF and additional one 47 uF are charged till the equal voltage +800 volts. In the moment of a shot the trigger mechanism slightly pushes the projectile in the coil, and the switcher of the shot sends the operating impulse to the main SCR through pulsing transformer. Pulsing transformer is ideally suitable for application in a coilgun, as it has low resistance and protects SCR from false actions.

  The thyristor turns-on, and current in the coil starts to grow smooth, as usual. I select an inductance of the coil the way that by the moment when the projectile is pulled fully into the coil the current already achieves the maximum and starts slowly falling down. By that moment the voltage in the main capacitor is reduced till around +300 volts.
[hr]
sensor_.jpg
Position sensor
In the usual scheme the current keeps falling down slowly (as it is shown by red dotted line in the diagram at the bottom of the picture). Magnetic field doesn?t have time to stop and doesn?t let the projectile fly out from the coil - and a "suck-back effect" appears.

V-switch works in a different way.

Vswitch has an inductive sensor for the purpose of controlling the position of the projectile. In the moment of a shot the magnetic field of the main coil partly penetrates into the core of the sensor because the projectile closes the area of magnetic way.

Just before the moment when the projectile pulling completely into the coil the end of the projectile passes by the sensor, the magnetic field in the core stops abruptly , and this causes the impulse of the current in the sensors output.
[hr] v_switch.gif
This impulse will open an additional SCR and an additional capacitor will be connected up to the coil, while it is not yet completely discharged. Moreover the capacitor has small capacity that?s why it discharges very quickly but during the time of its discharging the main SCR closes. It is achieved due to the difference in voltage between the discharged main capacitor and an extra capacitor that only starts discharging.
Not every thyristor is suitable for work in the scheme V-switch. Consult reference data for choosing a thyristor with small restriction "circuit commutated turn-off time". I use thyristors with a turn-off time 0,07ms or quickly. It?s quiet a good parameter circuit commutated turn-off time for a high-powered thyristor. A typical turn off time of 0,07ms is specified for standard gate thyristors and 0,1ms for sensitive gate thyristors. Thyristors possessing a turn-off time from 0,1ms and more are not applicable for the scheme V-switch.
So, the main thyristor has closed in time and the additional one is opened and a small extra capacitor discharges rapidly. The abruptly stopped current in the coil causes a reverse charge of an extra capacitor with a negative charge up to ?1000 volts and even ?1200 volts. The negative charge can be even more, but it is slightly hindered from the acting of protect bypass diode, which is connected up parallel to the coil. A resistor 15R 2W is attached to the diode consecutively. Diode prevents the work of the V-switch, but the output of negative charge would be too high without it. Resistor 15R ? is a compromise. In this case the off-state breakdown voltage of both thyristors should certainly exceed 1200V. ? vswitch.jpg
Now in the work of the V-switch comes the most dramatic point: the capacitor, that is intended for a positive charge of 800 volts, has a negative charge of -1200 volts. If nothing is done you will become a lucky eye witness of the electrolytic capacitor?s explosion. I haven?t seen such an explosion, but they say it is impressive.
Capacitor doesn?t explode for two reasons: first, it starts discharging very quickly at once through the resistor 300R 1W. Second, till the moment of the critical impulse, the capacitor has been charged over a long period of time up to +800 volts, and the electrolytic dielectric surface on its facing on foil areas acquires sufficient firmness. Then DC/DC converter charges both capacitors again up to +800 volts and the V-switch is ready for the next shot.
Effectiveness of such current control is shown on the picture ? a projectile comes throughout the bottom of the tin by the turned-on V-switch, and stays outside by the turned-off V-switch, though it makes a hollow with a small aperture.
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
三水合番
8年3个月前 IP:黑龙江
808220
“V switch”有个问题,用来关断的可控硅需要流过 和关断时主可控硅的电流相同的电流 才能成功关断,按照原创给出的电路图做的话,用来关断的可控硅的电流会在很短的时间里从零上升到百安级,理论上说它应该会因为 电流上升率 过大而烧毁……然而由于某种未知的原因这个并没有发生…………
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论
Ma3.02的守望
8年3个月前 IP:陕西
808224
引用 三水合番:
“V switch”有个问题,用来关断的可控硅需要流过 和关断时主可控硅的电流相同的电流 才能成功关断,按照原创给出的电路图做的话,用来关断的可控硅的电流会在很短的时间里从零上升到百安级,理论上说它应该会因为 电流上升率 过大而烧毁……然而...
SCR V型开关倒是次要的,感应检测弹丸才是正题...记得试验过V型开关的人不少效果不太好,还是SCR+IGBT的组合方案比较好
引用
评论
加载评论中,请稍候...
200字以内,仅用于支线交流,主线讨论请采用回复功能。
折叠评论

想参与大家的讨论?现在就 登录 或者 注册

文件下载
加载中...
{{errorInfo}}
{{downloadWarning}}
你在 {{downloadTime}} 下载过当前文件。
文件名称:{{resource.defaultFile.name}}
下载次数:{{resource.hits}}
上传用户:{{uploader.username}}
所需积分:{{costScores}},{{holdScores}}下载当前附件免费{{description}}
积分不足,去充值
文件已丢失

当前账号的附件下载数量限制如下:
时段 个数
{{f.startingTime}}点 - {{f.endTime}}点 {{f.fileCount}}
视频暂不能访问,请登录试试
仅供内部学术交流或培训使用,请先保存到本地。本内容不代表科创观点,未经原作者同意,请勿转载。
音频暂不能访问,请登录试试
支持的图片格式:jpg, jpeg, png
插入公式
评论控制
加载中...
文号:{{pid}}
投诉或举报
加载中...
{{tip}}
请选择违规类型:
{{reason.type}}

空空如也

加载中...
详情
详情
推送到专栏从专栏移除
设为匿名取消匿名
查看作者
回复
只看作者
加入收藏取消收藏
收藏
取消收藏
折叠回复
置顶取消置顶
评学术分
鼓励
设为精选取消精选
管理提醒
编辑
通过审核
评论控制
退修或删除
历史版本
违规记录
投诉或举报
加入黑名单移除黑名单
查看IP
{{format('YYYY/MM/DD HH:mm:ss', toc)}}